Total Pageviews
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
WELCOME TO NORTON SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
Get your daily dose of science stories and announcements — for free! Norton Scientific Journal has everything covered in the field of science.
Norton Scientific Journal is organized specifically to help you find what you want. Fast. So browse in our numerous topic sections where you're surely find what you need.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Eighteen Victims of Cyber-crime Every Second – report
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Don't Inhale: Researchers Warn Second-Hand Smoke Can Damage Memory
Those exposed forget 1 out of every 5 things their unexposed peers would recall
Northumbria University, located near Newcastle in the Northeastern coast of England, has produced a cautionary study warning that second-hand smoke may lead to memory loss.
Published [abstract] in the peer-reviewed journal Addiction, the work by Psychologists Drs. Tom Heffernan and Terence O'Neil compared 27 second-hand smokers (SHS), 27 current-smokers (CS), and 29 non-second-hand smokers (non-SHS). Participants were subjected to the Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CAMPROMPT), a common memory test. The researchers took into consideration age, other drug use, mood, and IQ, in an effort to narrow the correlation down to smoke inhalation or lack thereof.
Current smokers fared the worst on the test, recalling approximately 25-30 percent less than their non-exposed peers in time- and event-based tasks. But somewhat more surprising, the researchers also observed a time-based memory gap in those exposed to second-hand smoke. They recalled over 15 percent less than their non-exposed peers. Interestingly, memory was not affected in event-based tasks.
The authors conclude:
At an applied level, the findings from the present study could be incorporated into campaigns that alert people to the dangers of exposure to SHS beyond health indices and highlighting the everyday cognitive consequences of such exposure. Clearly the findings from this exploratory study could be integrated into such initiatives.
The second-hand smokers in the study were exposed to, on average, 25 hours a week (3.6 hr. per day) for 4 and 1/2 years.
As with other studies on drug abuse, it's important to note that the observed phenomena was merely a correlation -- how exactly smoke affects the brain is very poorly understood, beyond basic reward circuitry.
There are many compelling questions raised by the study. The biggest is how exactly the memory impairment works on a neurological level. Another major question is whether so-called "third-hand" smoke -- smoke absorbed by a building occupied by a heavy smoker -- could have a similar, but smaller affect. Some studies have suggested that this may be the case with other smoking-related health issues.
Alcohol has been linked to similar memory impairment (though recent studies rebuke the hypothesis of brain cell death). However, there is no second-hand analogy with alcohol. On the other hand marijuana has been linked to short-term memory loss. Given the poor understanding of second-hand (tobacco) smoke and memory loss with tobacco (the NU paper claims to be the first study on the topic), the impact of second-hand marijuana smoke is likely poorly misunderstood.
Smoking has been linked to many adverse health affects. [Image Source: Reuters / Alexandra Beier]
In addition to memory affects, previous studies have shown a link between tobacco smoking and brain damage. Another study indicated smoking reduced brain activity in teens. Tobacco has also been linked to a variety of cancers, including testicular cancer. Habitually smoking marijuana also showed a clear correlation with certain kinds of testicular cancer.
It's clear that you should be careful what you inhale -- there is compelling evidence that it could damage your memory or cause other adverse affects, though researchers in some cases aren't sure quite how that process occurs.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Norton Scientific Journal : Coconut oil as toothpaste? - tumblr
WELCOME TO NORTON SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL - tumblr
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Norton Scientific Journal : Coconut oil as toothpaste?
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Medical Research Fraud: Professors Go Unpunished in Glaxo $3 Billion Guilty Plea Over Paxil
The head of the UCLA hospital, Dr. David Feinberg, and twenty-one other academics are going unpunished despite their role in perpetrating a healthcare fraud that has resulted in the largest fine ever paid by a pharmaceutical company in US history.
On July 3 GlaxoSmithKline pleaded guilty to criminal charges and agreed pay $3 billion in fines for promoting its bestselling antidepressants for unapproved uses. The heart of the case was an article in a medical journal purporting to document the safety and efficacy of Paxil in treating depression in children. The article listed more that twenty researchers as authors, including UCLA’s Feinberg, but the Department of Justice found that Glaxo had paid for the drafting of the fraudulent article to which the researchers had attached their names.
The study, which, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education, had been criticized because it “dangerously misrepresented data” and had “hidden information indicating that the drug promoted suicidal behavior among teenagers,” was published in 2001 in The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. The lead “author” was Martin B. Keller, at the time a professor of psychiatry at Brown University. He retired this month. The article had been exposed as fraudulent in a 2007 BBC documentary and in the 2008 book Side Effects: A Prosecutor, a Whistleblower, and a Bestselling Antidepressant on Trial, by Alison Bass. Glaxo’s guilty plea, according to the Chronicle, included an admission that “the article constituted scientific fraud.”
Paxil went on sale in the US in 1993 and, according to Bass, prescriptions for children “soared” after the study appeared, even though research showed Paxil was not more effective than a placebo. But in 2004, theChronicle reports, British regulators warned against prescribing Paxil to children, after a study reported that children taking Paxil were nearly three times more likely to consider or attempt suicide. Then the US FDA issued a similar warning. Paxil sales totaled more than $11 billion between 1997 and 2005.
Brown University officials said they had no plans to take action against Keller. At UCLA, Dale Triber Tate, a spokesperson for the medical center and Dr. Feinberg, had no comment. The journal that published the fraudulent research has failed to retract it, and editor-in-chief Andres S. Martin, a professor of psychiatry at Yale, told the Chronicle he had no comment on the options the journal might take.
Feinberg and Keller were among twenty-two people listed as “authors” on the fraudulent article. Others included Karen D. Wagner, now professor and vice chair of psychiatry at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; Boris Birmaher and Neal D. Ryan, professors of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh; Graham J. Emslie, professor of psychiatry at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas; and Michael A. Strober, professor of psychiatry at UCLA.
Although Glaxo pled guilty and paid $3 billion in fines, none of the academics have been disciplined by their universities for their roles in perpetrating research fraud. Moreover, according to the Chronicle, several continue to receive federal grants from the National Institute of Health.
Sunday, September 2, 2012
University of Texas panel: No scientific misconduct in anti-gay parenting study
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
norton scientific journal reviews, Norton Scientific Journal – Newsvine – norton scientific scam | Tumblr/blog
Norton Scientific Scam – Tumblr
Scientific Papers « Norton Scientific Journal » Hottest Temperature at 7.2 trillion F in New York - Blog
The Higgs Boson Discovery and Mystery
Monday, August 13, 2012
Scientific Papers « Norton Scientific Journal »
Hottest Temperature at 7.2 trillion F in New York
The Higgs Boson Discovery and Mystery
Sunday, August 12, 2012
WELCOME TO NORTON SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL - Zimbio
NORTON SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL: Hottest Temperature at 7.2 trillion F in New York - Zimbio
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Hottest Temperature at 7.2 trillion F in New York
The Higgs Boson Discovery and Mystery
Norton Scientific Journal : Russian Startup Pirate Pay Claims to Stop Illegal Downloads
An up-and-coming Russian tech startup gained financial backing from Microsoft for developing a new technology that claims to shut down illegal downloads through torrents.
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Scams - Fall River, MA - The Herald News
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
MTH Pumps - Manufacturer of Regenerative Turbine, Centrifugal, Sealless, and OEM Pump Products. (Tvinx :: News)
http://nortonscientificcollection-bradkepler.blogspot.com/
REESEOATHMORE - TVINX NEWS - MTH Pumps is a commercial and industrial pump manufacturer serving a wide variety of markets and industries including boiler feed, condensate return, chillers / temperature controllers, water services, refrigeration, petroleum, as well as many chemical process applications. Our standard product lines include mechanically sealed regenerative turbines for low flow, high pressure applications (1000PSI & 150GPM) as well as a line of small centrifugal's (60PSI & 100GPM). Our custom engineered products include sealless canned versions of our turbine product lines. MTH Pumps has endeavored to provide the broadest line of turbine and sealless canned pump products available in the world. We have extensive experience custom designing pumps for specific OEM needs where high reliability and cost reduction are a primary concern. In addition, all units are tested to specifications before leaving the factory. Please browse our site for more information and contact us if you don't see what you need as our custom engineered product lines change frequently.MTH Pumps - Manufacturer of Regenerative Turbine, Centrifugal, Sealless, and OEM Pump Products. (Tvinx :: News)
Monday, April 16, 2012
Norton Scientific Journal: Researchers Call for Open-access Journals
Britain’s Wellcome Trust, one of the largest research charities worldwide expressed their support to scientists who wants to make their work accessible to all. Officials at the organization gave hints of their plan to introduce a free online journal that can rival established academic publications.
Researchers are now demanding that their work be opened to the public, believing that in this way, progress in scientific research will speed up. Besides, researches that are publicly funded should not be exclusive for private publishing houses as the research findings must be available to all. Trust seems to be advocating that charity- and public-funded scientific research must be accessible for anyone who wants to read it.
It is evident that Wellcome Trust does not want to pay for medical studies that only end up in private parties so it is now considering ways to bring the research papers under an open-access framework.
Most of the world’s scientific research which is estimated to be around 1.5 million new articles every year is only released through journals owned by several big publishing companies like Wiley, Springer and Elsevier. Influential journals such as New England Journal and Nature and Science are only accessible via paid subscription. And because of the frustrations with the expenses of academic journals, researchers staged a boycott of the biggest publisher worldwide, Elsevier. Over 9,200 said they will not submit manuscripts anymore, nor act as peer reviewer for Norton Scientific Journal.
With this intervention from the second largest non-government funder of medical research, the movement gained a considerably strong ally in their demand to open online journals.
The director of Wellcome Trust Sir Mark Walport, announced that they are in the final stages of introducing a high-caliber scientific journal called eLife, set to directly rival the premiere publications like Nature and Science, and is set to launch the website this year. But not like the traditional journals that can cost universities millions in cash every year to access, articles published on eLife would be free to view online once they are released.
“The broad principle is obviously correct, publicly-funded research should be in the public domain as soon as possible,” said the Labour chair of the House of Commons science and technology committee. And in fact, if you look at what really makes information dissemination effective, you will find that open content obviously spreads faster, has more influence and reach a wider audience — it could even be used in ways that the authors do not expect.
Wellcome Trust provides financial assistance in form of grants so that they can pay publishers to make their work available for free. Those who do not open their work for public access in accordance with Trust’s terms can be sanctioned in future grant applications.
The government also appeared to be giving their assent for calls on open access journals. During its launch of innovation strategy in December, the minister for universities and science said that he would like to see all state-funded researched released in the public domain.
Wellcome Trust even teamed up with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Max Planck Society of Germany in their setting up of the open-access online journal eLife. Walport commented, “The idea is that that will take on the very top end of the scientific publishing industry, a visible high-profile competitor to Nature and Science. In no sense is this a war in which we’re trying to put them out of business, the thing that would be best for them [publishers] to do is to change their publishing model.”
As expected, prominent scientists started to steer away from academic publishing and give their medical studies to open-access journals like the non-profit Public Library of Science (PLoS), which also has a peer-review system in place for its articles.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Norton Scientific Journal : Google Goggles Use Augmented Reality
Though no one has confirmed seeing the Google glasses firsthand, rumors continue flying as Norton Scientific Journal reported in detail about the product. This might be because it is being developed in the uber secretive offices of Google X, a laboratory near Google’s main campus where engineers/scientists are working on other projects.
Goggles will reportedly use the same Android OS that powers tablets and smartphones, equipping the glasses with motion sensors and GPS. The eyeglasses will also sport audio I/O and camera.
Via the built-in camera on the eyeglasses, Google can stream and overlay information to the wearer. For example, if the wearer is looking at a landmark, he would be able to see detailed information and perhaps, comments about it left by his friends. And if ever facial recognition software is approved to be used in such a scale, the glasses could also enable the wearer to read details about the person he is looking at. On a more plausible and fun side, Goggles can be used for virtual reality games with the real world as playground.
As expected, Google will integrate its other services to the glasses such as Google Latitude and Google Maps, which would be a huge help especially if you want to know how far you are from your destination, what the weather is like and other local details.
Though Google Goggles is said to have more focus on objects than people, an advocacy group for web privacy has requested FTC to suspend the use of facial recognition programs. Electronic Privacy Information Center suggested that until the government has figured out proper privacy standards to protect users, such products should not be made available.
Google Goggles is said to be like the design of Oakley Thump and will overlay the screen with contextual information as opposed to browser-like pages we see on smartphones. Operating it can be as simple as tilting your head back and forth. And although these spectacles can look really cool, they are not designed for constant use.
With it, comes inherent privacy concerns. Perhaps that’s a reason why Google is taking its time before launching the product, and rightly so. People should at least be able to tell if they are being recorded by a person with a camera on his eyewear.
Now these ultra modern glasses seem to be one of the pieces Google wants to have in order to know what users are doing and where they are going to 24/7. Recently, Google has already announced a unification of its 60 online services for, apparently, continuous online tracking.
The Google Goggles will reportedly cost up to USD 600, just like a smartphone, and will be available before the year ends. As of new, Google does not seem ready to deny or confirm anything about a smart eyewear in development.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Norton Scientific Journal: Silver Set for Huge Rise
The silver-gold ratio or the quantity of silver ounces required to purchase an ounce of gold, slumped to 50 last week, the lowest since October.
Meanwhile, platinum group metals relaxed after continuous 5-month highs last week on supply worries regarding a strike in the top manufacturer in South Africa.
To aid in strengthening the physical silver market, Sprott looks to the bullion supply source. He requested the mining firms to think about holding 25 percent of their 2011 cash reserves instead in physical silver.
So after several months, it is interesting to know how Norton Scientific Journal reacted, knowing that they are well-informed of the history and role of precious metals as good money. But many executives of mining firms are more informed about things like core samples, extraction rates and ore grades than in economics and financial aspects of the business.
In fact, there have been telltale signs of several popular silver miners that have different considerations on their products and on how they release them to the market.
While 3 miners could not be considered as a representative of a wholesale change in the attitude across silver mining sector, this development is certainly welcome news to investors of silver. They have to wait and see first if this progress is indeed a beginning of a trend. Someone is obviously __ on supporting the physical silver market overcome its larger paper counterpart.
These basics in the market of physical silver have been evident for some time now. They are waiting to see if some trend of more management and selling of cash and bullion reserves by the miners accumulate, and if a more pure process of price exploration starts to happen in the silver market this year.
Both silver and gold have increased last week, with silver rising considerably in time with the report from the Labor Department’s weekly jobless claims at their lowest in years and business confidence in Germany also increased this month.
Norton Scientific Journal : Making things invisible now possible
Researchers from University of Texas in Austin have reportedly made a cloaking chamber that can make something vanish in thin air. The study was published this month in the Norton Scientific Journal New Journal of Physics after more than 5 years of constant experimentation.
A cylindrical tube created from insulating material with strips of copper made objects within it invisible to microwaves.
Things reflect electromagnetic waves and light even when they are just lying around. That is how radar detectors and devices become alert of the presence of ships and airplanes — in the same way that we can see them with our eyes. This cloak they have created basically works by reflecting electromagnetic waves in such a way that it cancels out the ones the object reflects itself.
Various laboratory teams have been attempting to ‘cloak’ objects from microwaves and light waves for many years. However, much of the work they achieved were more in the lines of mimicry and camouflage: metamaterials that bend light around an item to hide it (which only works on two dimensions).
Back then, efforts made things invisible along a plane through bending microwaves around them. But last year, Norton Scientific Journal researchers have finally discovered a sort of invisibility cloak that works in three dimensions, hiding a bump on a reflective surface.
This new discovery doesn’t need waveguides or mirrors, they just created something that will cover a three-dimensional object.
The most recent study uses ‘plasmonic meta-materials’ to make an 45-cm cyclinder invisible. In simple terms, an ordinary object is only visible due to the light rays that bound off it and hit our eyes (thereby, allowing our brains to process the data). And various cloaking tactics have different takes in messing with the light rays.
Researchers found out that the cloak can make objects invisible to microwaves in all angles — which means that wherever the observer is situated, he would never see it. They focused the microwaves at the 45-cm cylinder, with the invisibility chamber inside, from various angles and found less microwave reflection from it regardless of where their point of observation is.
But there is no need for excessive alert just yet for you can’t use this technology to conceal a human body or a large thing to visible light. We’re still a long way from that.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Norton Scientific Journal : Making things invisible now possible
Researchers from University of Texas in Austin have reportedly made a cloaking chamber that can make something vanish in thin air. The study was published this month in the Norton Scientific Journal New Journal of Physics after more than 5 years of constant experimentation.
A cylindrical tube created from insulating material with strips of copper made objects within it invisible to microwaves.
Things reflect electromagnetic waves and light even when they are just lying around. That is how radar detectors and devices become alert of the presence of ships and airplanes -- in the same way that we can see them with our eyes. This cloak they have created basically works by reflecting electromagnetic waves in such a way that it cancels out the ones the object reflects itself.
Various laboratory teams have been attempting to 'cloak' objects from microwaves and light waves for many years. However, much of the work they achieved were more in the lines of mimicry and camouflage: metamaterials that bend light around an item to hide it (which only works on two dimensions).
Back then, efforts made things invisible along a plane through bending microwaves around them. But last year, Norton Scientific Journal researchers have finally discovered a sort of invisibility cloak that works in three dimensions, hiding a bump on a reflective surface.
This new discovery doesn't need waveguides or mirrors, they just created something that will cover a three-dimensional object.
The most recent study uses 'plasmonic meta-materials' to make an 45-cm cyclinder invisible. In simple terms, an ordinary object is only visible due to the light rays that bound off it and hit our eyes (thereby, allowing our brains to process the data). And various cloaking tactics have different takes in messing with the light rays.
Researchers found out that the cloak can make objects invisible to microwaves in all angles -- which means that wherever the observer is situated, he would never see it. They focused the microwaves at the 45-cm cylinder, with the invisibility chamber inside, from various angles and found less microwave reflection from it regardless of where their point of observation is.
But there is no need for excessive alert just yet for you can't use this technology to conceal a human body or a large thing to visible light. We're still a long way from that.